7

Selangor Open: National Rating details By GilaChess 05 May 2008 at 10:32 am and have 7 Comments

35th Royal Selangor International Open Chess Tournament 2008
MCF Rating statistics
No.   Name FED Rat Eval.Pts. Eval.Gam. Nrat-Ø Rtg+/-
1 FM Lim Yee-Weng MAS 2123 7½ 8 1913 30.2
2   Lim Chuin Hoong Ronnie MAS 2157 7 9 1909 0.9
3 FM Chan Nicholas MAS 2140 7 9 1959 13.2
4   Che Hassan Abdullah MAS 1927 6½ 9 1818 18.9
5   Wahiduddin Kamalarifin MAS 1770 6 9 1834 53.9
6 FM Tedy Sukirman ** INA 2254 6 9 1866 -87.4
7   Ong Way Justin MAS 1762 6 9 1891 89.9
8   Yeoh Chin Seng MAS 1772 6 9 1759 35.3
9   Abdul Shukor Abdul Aziz MAS 1663 6 9 1774 80.0
10   Abdullah Mohd Kamal MAS 2019 5½ 9 1758 -28.8
11   Jamal’s Hendry INA 2218 5½ 9 1760 -36.9
12   Bakri Alia Anin Azwa MAS 1669 5½ 9 1790 67.7
13   Yeoh Phee Leong Marcus MAS 1634 5½ 9 1810 77.3
14   Ahmad Ismail MAS 1715 5½ 9 1730 32.1
15   Yusof Kamaluddin MAS 1954 5½ 9 1815 -8.2
16   Pereira Johnharry SIN 1677 5½ 9 1703 48.4
17   Udani Ian PHI 2017 5 9 1993 5.7
18 WIM Lumongdong Lisa Karlina INA 2065 5 9 1834 -29.1
19   Lindiawati Evi INA 2029 5 9 1890 -14.7
20   Khandhar Kaushal MAS 1773 5 9 1907 46.1
21   Shaikh Ali Nor Ilhamuddin MAS 1804 5 9 1900 40.5
22 WIM Tamin Upi Darmayana INA 2134 5 9 1684 -55.0
23   Leong Mun Wan MAS 1955 5 8 1724 -25.3
24   Tan Ken Wei MAS 1843 5 9 1674 -26.4
25   Morsin Ahmad MAS 1740 5 9 1703 1.7
26   Yeoh Li Tian MAS 1611 5 9 1717 44.5
27   Manikam Ralvin MAS 1586 5 9 1728 61.5
28   Lim Kian Hwa MAS 1723 5 9 1648 -11.2
29   Tham Tick Hong Jax MAS 1779 4½ 9 1732 -16.3
30   Ilias Mohd Safri MAS 1638 4½ 9 1666 11.2
31   Wahiduddin Khairunnisa MAS 1672 4½ 9 1664 -8.7
32   Trenseno Felica * INA 1550 4½ 9 1616 38.6
33   Mat Daud Zullkafli MAS 1550 4½ 8 1586 30.1
34   Zullkafli Nur Shazwani MAS 1762 4 9 1789 -6.2
35   Erowan Masrin MAS 1810 4 9 1727 -39.9
36   Marmono Roslina MAS 1702 4 9 1736 -6.9
37   Sabri Mohd Saprin MAS 1912 4 9 1723 -59.3
38   Lim Zhuo Ren MAS 1876 4 9 1666 -55.7
39   Omar Muhd Firdaus MAS 1525 4 9 1638 27.4
40   Ismail Norazman MAS 1754 4 9 1752 -8.9
41   Mohd Noor Ahmad Eizran Ezra MAS 1647 4 9 1656 -8.9
42   Demudu Subramaniam MAS 1509 4 9 1544 -7.2
43   Yeop Mat Zaki MAS 1509 4 9 1652 27.9
44   Ng Kiang Wei MAS 1597 4 9 1530 -35.4
45   S. Balendran MAS 1528 4 9 1654 14.0
46   Ruslan Haslindah MAS 1510 4 8 1583 17.9
47   Saleh Fikri MAS 1460 4 9 1446 -16.6
48   Abd Rahman Syazrin MAS 1549 3½ 9 1630 -12.7
49   Shafiq Abd Rauf Wan Mohd Arif MAS 1589 3½ 9 1679 -3.3
50   Narayanasamy N. Annadurai * MAS 1550 3½ 9 1579 -41.08
51   Ee Sun-Xin MAS 1212 3½ 9 1586 118.7
52   Abu Bakar Mohd Syahir MAS 1464 3½ 9 1477 -17.6
53   Ooi Boon Seng Andrew MAS 1527 3 9 1569 -32.6
54   Tan Yong Zhao MAS 1329 3 9 1462 -9.9
55   Yahaya Muhd Nur Islam MAS 1128 3 9 1435 56.1
56   Azrin Aminur Nirza MAS 1143 2½ 9 1380 27.6
57   Poon Guo Liong Derek MAS 1383 2½ 9 1456 -47.6
58   Ahmad Yahaya * MAS 1550 2½ 9 1297 -203.7
59   Aminuddin Nur Faqihah MAS 1292 2½ 9 1294 -90.7
60   Saleh Anis Fariha MAS 887 1½ 8 1345 -5.8
61   Abdul Latif Saleh MAS 902 2 9 1385 39.6
62   Viajantheran Viknesh MAS 1143 1 8 1274 -65.1

Viewed 434 times by 166 viewers


Previous Post
Next Post
Add comment

7 responses : “ Selangor Open: National Rating details ”

  1. 1
    Malaysian : 05 May 2008 at 8:19 pm

    Looking at the national rating list, there seems to be many anomalies in the ratings of some of the strongest Malaysian players relative to some benchmark players.

    If we were to accept LYW, RL and NC to be at the top of the heap and rated in the 1900s, going down the list we immediately see Yeoh Chin Seng at 1759, Kamal at 1758, Ismail Ahmad at 1730, Leong Mun Wan at 1724, Lim Kian Hwa at 1648, Jax Tham at 1732, Saprin at 1723 eg. to be grossly under-rated. What happens is when these players take part in tournaments they will pull down the performances of their opponents by virtue of their unrealistic ratings.

    Can the rating authority take action to rectify the problem to present a more balanced rating list?

  2. 2
    man : 07 May 2008 at 9:44 am

    It shows that you haven’t been to any tourney for so long that you can’t even read a table properly.FYI the actual rating is listed next to the Federation, while the one you are referring to is the average opponent’s rating.

    Of course there will be some initial discrepancy eg. look at Tedy Sukirman, since this is the first time he’s playing in Malaysia, his FIDE rating is used as his Malaysian rating; but this will be corrected over time.

  3. 3
    GilaChess : 09 May 2008 at 8:33 pm

    I’ve been to so many tournaments and I don’t even know that!! :)

  4. 4
    Malaysian : 09 May 2008 at 9:51 pm

    This is a perfect example of unconstructive posting on the net. You should address the rating discrepancy instead of narrow minded personal verbal attack on me for not crossing the t’s and dotting the i’s.

    Don’t you realise that makes the situation even worse than I thought.Now LYW, RL and NC are at 2100+, K Wahiduddin at 1770, J Ong at 1762, YCS at 1772, Ahmad Ismail( World Police Champion)at 1715, Marcus Yeo at 1634 and many others as well are so under-rated. They are some 300-400 points off and I am certain there is no such chasm betweem them and the top 3.

  5. 5
    Malaysian : 09 May 2008 at 10:22 pm

    A national rating list which makes no attempt to reconcile the obvious existing rating discrepancies is of doubtful value to the promotion of healthy chess development.

  6. 6
    GilaChess : 09 May 2008 at 11:57 pm

    I’ve heard Tse Pin say before that the National rating list is 200-300 points below the actual ELO rating.

  7. 7
    Malaysian : 10 May 2008 at 12:07 am

    It is not so much about how many points eg LYW’s national rating is compared to Fide’s. It is about how many national rating points he is above eg Ismail Ahmad, an unbelievable 408!!!!! With that difference LYW is expected to wipe the floor with IA theoretically, but we all know that cannot be the case in reality. Do you agree?

Leave a Reply

    • Ads


  • Flickr

  • Entries (RSS)


    • Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin