`Not only have the reading and math skills of these children soared, their ability to socialize has increased substantially, too. Our studies have shown the incidents of suspension and outside altercations have decreased by at least 60 percent since these children became interested in chess.”
–Assistant Principal Joyce Brown at the Roberto Clemente School in New York, 1988 (from TEACHER’S GUIDE: RESEARCH AND BENEFITS OF CHESS
)
I’m usually a passive person and rarely have any outburst of anger in a chess tournament. However there was one incident many years ago which happened in a weekly tournament organised by the old KLCA. Back then there was no internet and I was not GilaChess yet.
I had a losing game but both me and my opponent were in severe time trouble. Enough material were on board for either player to lose on time. Of course I wanted to draw but my opponent wanted to press for the win risking losing on time in the process. It was very tense and a crowd formed around our table(another plus point for BIG SCREENS for chess to avoid overcrowding). Suddenly a spectator called out “illegal move!!” right after my move and I was shocked that someone who is not playing can interfere like that. Moves were taken back and I eventually lost the game. I went to the arbiter to complain but he said there was nothing he can do about it. I asked him to at least give a verbal warning to that spectator but even that request was denied. I kept quiet but was fuming mad inside. It didn’t help when I found out that this person was a friend of my opponent.
It so happen that the object of my anger was also a participant in the tournament and the very next round I was paired against him. I wanted my revenge so bad I could taste it. After shaking hands at the start of the game, it took a tremendous amount of restraint to avoid lunging forward, wrapping my hands around his neck and strangling him. That satiated me somewhat – just strangling him in my mind, that is.
I played black and went for the Benko Gambit which my opponent accepted the gambit pawn. That gave black the traditional initiative in return for the sacrificed pawn. I played angrily throughout the game and my only thought was to inflict him the same amount of psychological pain I suffered when he shouted “illegal move” for his friend earlier.
It was lucky for him that he lost the game. Otherwise I may have just strangled him for real after the game.
Sigh. Those were the days when there was fire in my belly and I could play with passion for the game. Nowadays, exciting games are rare for me. I’m just happy to play a decent game without losing like a patzer.
Back then I was young and I had the energy to play exciting chess. My point is that it is the same for all teenagers. Probably from the age of 8-16 is their best formative chess years. They play chess with fantastic energy and most of the important fundamentals of chess is formed during these years. After 16, if they have not picked up the essential chess strength then, it would be difficult for them to make significant gains from the game. They can still improve of course, but not at the same rate as when they were younger.
Just my 2 cents.
Viewed 831 times by 335 viewers